Progress in Chemistry

Figure/Table detail

Research on the Construction Strategy and Interface Control of Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction Electrodes

Zheng Zhang, Xiaoqiang Guo, Xiaoming Zhang, Shuangjie Liu

Progress in Chemistry, DOI: 10.7536/PC20250708

Fig. 4 Graphene and carbon nanotube thin-film electrode constructs: (A) Synthesis procedures of RGOL@PPS/CNT+RGO thin films. (B, C) SEM images of Cu₂O nanocrystals on RGOL@PPS/CNT+RGO thin films at 15 s and (D, E) 90 s electrodeposition times. (F) Polarization curves of (PPS/CNT+RGO)-Cu₂O, RGOL@PPS/CNT+RGO and PPS/CNT+RGO substrates with polarization curves^[20]. (G) Schematic of Co/MnO@N-C synthesis. (H) Typical TEM images of Co/MnO@N-C^[22]. (I) SEM photographs of cross sections of NCS/EG and top views of (J) NCS/EG/CNT-H. (K) Corresponding elemental mappings of C, S, Co and Ni. (L) CV curves and capacitance contributions of NCS/EG/CNT-H^[65]

Other figure/table from this article

Table 1 Typical reaction mechanism framework (CO pathway as an example)
Table 2 Cathode complete reaction (using CO₂ as the starting material)
Fig. 1 Electrode configurations of Cu-based materials: (A) Catalytic mechanism of Cu electrode. (B) Scanning electron microscope images (SEM) of 0.5-UiO/Cu. (C) SEM and EDS elemental mapping of cross-section. (D) FE vs. potential of CO₂RR and HER products^[26]. (E) FE vs. potential of C₂₊ products on Cu and 0.5-UiO/Cu. (F) FE vs. potential of HER and CO₂RR product distributions on Cu, UiO-66, 0.5-UiO/Cu, and 0.5-UiO/Cu-bare electrodes. (G) Schematic diagram of the microfluidic electrolyzer. (H) Typical SEM images of the nanoporous Cu catalysts, (I) cross-sectional SEM images of the nanoporous Cu catalysts on GDL, and (J) typical HRTEM images. (K) Timing current profiles of CO₂RR on nanoporous Cu at different potentials, (L) electrolytic C₂₊ fractional current density, and (M) corresponding FE^[48]
Fig. 2 Electrode configurations of Zn, Ag, and Sn-based materials: (A) Porous Zn electrode can convert CO₂ to CO at -0.95 V (relative to the RHE electrode) with high FE (∼95%) and current density (27 mA cm⁻²). (B) SEM images of Cu lattice and (C) P-Zn. (D) Potential-dependent current densities of P-Zn and Zn foils. (E) FE of CO. (F) Schematic representation of the local pH effect in CO₂RR^[4]. (G) Schematic representation of the synthesis process of Ag/Sn-SnO₂ nanosheets electrocatalyzing the conversion of CO₂ to pure HCOOH solution. (H, I) Typical TEM images of Ag/Sn-SnO₂ NSs. (J) Particle size distribution of Sn-SnO₂ in Ag/Sn-SnO₂ NSs. (K) Particle size distribution of Ag/HRTEM images and corresponding FFT maps of Sn-SnO₂ NSs with integrated pixel intensities of Ag, Sn, and SnO₂. (L) HAADF-STEM images and EDX mapping images of Ag/Sn-SnO₂ NSs. (M) Electrocatalytic LSV curves. (N) FEs of formate CO and H₂. (O) Reduction of CO₂ in PSE cell to pure HCOOH with accompanying OER reaction. (P) Concentration of HCOOH under deionized water as a diffusion carrier, and the FE of the corresponding HCOOH^[18]
Fig. 3 Carbon paper electrode construction: (A) Catalytic mechanism of metal phthalocyanine loaded on carbon nanotube buckypaper. (B) TEM images of FePc/BP, (C) FePc/BP_f, (D) CoPc/BP and (E) CoPc/BP_f. (F) LSV of FePc/BP and FePc/BP_f, (G) CoPc/BP and CoPc/BP_f^[60]
Fig. 5 Carbon aerogel versus carbon foam electrode constructs: (A) Schematic representation of the active sites of Zn-750 and Zn-950. (B) SEM images of Zn-650 and (C) Zn-750. (D) ECSA curves and (E) LSV curves of Zn-T. (F) FE stability of Zn-750 after 8 h of continuous operation at −1.0 V vs. RHE^[23]
Fig. 6 Emerging structures with 3D printed electrodes: (A) 3D printed electrodes with different shapes and optimal 3Dp-PNCE catalytic electrodes. (B) TEM images of the optimal 3Dp-PNCE. (C) Comparison of current densities on 3Dp-CE, 3Dp-NCE, and 3Dp-PNCE. (D) CO₂RR stability test of 3Dp-PNCE at −0.7 V^[21]. (E) Schematic of the complete electrochemical flow cell (left), gaseous CO₂ reactants and target product C₂H₄ flow pattern (center), and surface morphology at the GDL/catalyst interface (right). (F) SEM image of H-PFPE. (G) Complete product distribution and total current density of H-Δ-PFPE-2.4 at 5 applied potentials^[13]
Fig. 7 Surface and interface engineering: (A) Schematic representation of CO₂conversion to formate mediated on a GC electrode in a liquid-phase electrolyzer and CO₂RR mediated on a GDE modified by [EMIM]⁺ layer in a gas-phase electrolyzer. (B) Conformational and chemical characterization of pristine GC cathode and modified GC cathode obtained by immobilization of imidazolium cation by SEM and WCA. (C) On IM⁺_EE/GDE cathode with 9 successive electrolysis at different current densities, respectively. (D) Variation of the average full-cell energy efficiency and EC of formate generation with applied current density on bare carbon GDE and IM⁺_EE/GDE, respectively^[12]. (E) Schematic diagram of the preparation process and the reaction mechanism of Si-Bi@C photocathode. SEM images of (F) SiNWs, (G) BiMOF and (H) Si-Bi@C800. (I) FE of Si-Bi@C1000 photocathode at different potentials (left). Chemical generation rate versus potential for Si, Si-Bi@C600, Si-Bi@C800 and Si-Bi@C1000 photocathodes (middle). Comparison of the catalytic performance of the Si-Bi@C800 photocathode with that of the reported photocathodes for the formation of formate from CO₂(right)^[9].
Table 3 Electrode test condition table
Fig. 8 Future and Prospects

About journal

About journal

Editorial board

Ethical statements

Contact

Cooperation

Browse

Current issue

Earlier issues

Special issues

Special topics

Feature section

MiniAccounts

Foot print of Chinese chemistry

Browse by areas

Top downloaded

Top viewed

Top cited

Just accepted

Author center

Guide for author

Submission now

Download center

Manuscript center

Editor login

EiC login

Peer reviewer login

Subscription

Print journal

E-mail Alert

Rss

Feedback

News

Figure/Table detail

模态框（Modal）标题

About journal

Browse

Feature section

Author center

Manuscript center

Subscription

Figure/Table detail