English
新闻公告
More
化学进展 2011, Vol. 23 Issue (7): 1263-1271 前一篇   后一篇

• 放射化学专辑 •

关于我国核燃料后处理/再循环的一些思考

顾忠茂1, 柴之芳2   

  1. 1. 中国原子能科学研究院 北京 102413;
    2. 中国科学院高能物理研究所 100049
  • 出版日期:2011-07-24 发布日期:2012-03-15

Some Thinking of Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing/Recycling in China

Gu Zhongmao1, Chai Zhifang2   

  1. 1. China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China;
    2. High Energy Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Online:2011-07-24 Published:2012-03-15
本文从核裂变能可持续发展的角度,对基于铀-钚循环的核燃料循环体系中的 “一次通过”循环、热堆闭式循环和快堆闭式循环的特点进行分析和比较,指出“一次通过”循环和热堆闭式循环均不能满足核能可持续发展的战略需要,快堆及核燃料多次循环才是我国核裂变能可持续发展的根本出路;介绍了国际上核燃料后处理/再循环的技术现状和主流发展趋势,指出我国在后处理/再循环技术方面与国际先进水平之间的差距;结合我国国情探讨我国核燃料后处理/再循环技术发展的总体构想和拟采取的技术路线,提出需要突破的关键技术问题和相应的配套措施。
Based on the uranium-plutonium fuel cycle, the once-through fuel cycle, closed fuel cycle for thermal reactors and closed fuel cycle for fast reactors are analyzed and compared from the view point of sustainable development of nuclear fission energy. It is pointed out that both the once-through fuel cycle and the closed fuel cycle of thermal reactor could not meet the strategic needs of sustainable development of nuclear energy and fast reactor with multi-recycling of nuclear fuel is the best option to develop the nuclear fission energy in a sustainable way. The present status and the major trend of reprocessing/recycling technologies in the world are introduced and the gap between China and the major nuclear energy countries is evaluated. Keeping the domestic situation in mind, we try to explore the general considerations of the development of nuclear fuel reprocessing/recycling technologies in China and the technical options to be taken. The key techniques to be solved and the associated supporting measures are also proposed. Contents
1 Introduction
2 Two options of nuclear fuel cycle-once-through fuel cycle and closed fuel cycle
2.1 Concept of nuclear fuel cycle
2.2 Problems of once-through fuel cycle
2.3 Characteristics of closed fuel cycle for thermal reactors
2.4 Advantages of closed fuel cycle for fast reactors
3 Present status and development trends of reprocessing/recycling technologies at home and abroad
3.1 World status and development trends of reprocessing/recycling technologies
3.2 China’s present status of reprocessing/recycling technologies and the gaps from the world advanced level
4 Preliminary considerations of China’s development strategy of reprocessing/recycling technologies
4.1 Recycle plutonium directly in fast reactors is adaptable in China
4.2 Follow the route of “breeder first, burner second” is adaptable in China
5 Key technologies to be developed for reprocessing/recycling in China
5.1 Reprocessing of spent fuel from thermal reactors
5.2 Reprocessing of spent fuel from fast reactors
6 Conclusions

中图分类号: 

()


[1] OECD, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Uranium 2005: Resources, Production and Demand OECD Publishing, 2005



[2] IAEA. Nuclear Technology Review -Update 2001, 45th Regular Session of IAEA General Conference, G(45)/INF/5, Annex 1, Aug. 29, 2001



[3] Glatz J P, Hans D, Magill J, Wider H. Partitioning and Transmutation Options in Spent Fuel Management, Global 2003, New Orleans, LA, November 16-20, 2003



[4] Kaplan P, Vinoche R, Devezeaux J G, et al. Spent Fuel Reprocessing: More Value for Money Spent in a Geological Repository? WM’03 Conference, February 23-27, 2003, Tucson, AZ, USA



[5] Bertel E, Wilmer P. Whither the Nuclear Fuel Cycle? Nuclear Energy, 2003, 42(3): 149-156



[6] Pelland B. Proliferation Issues of Plutonium Recycling, JNMM, 2002, 31(1): 30-38



[7] Baetsle L H, Raedt C D, Volckaert G. Impact of Advanced Fuel Cycles and Irradiation Scenarios on Final Disposal Issues, Global 99



[8] Eyre B.L. Power Generation for the 21st Century: What Role for Nuclear? Nuclear Energy, 1998, 37(1): 59-72



[9] 喻宏, 胡赟. 快堆内循环研究. 我国核燃料循环技术发展战略研究-分报告之三.2010



[10] Waste Management, Nuclear News 1999, 70-72



[11] Bouchard J. The closed fuel cycle and non-proliferation issues. Global 2005, Tsukuba, Japan, October 11, 2005



[12] Kelly J, Savage C. Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative(AFCI) Program Plan, May 1, 2005



[13] George F V, Monica C R, Scott B A. Lab-Scale Demonstration of the UREX+Process. WM’04 Conference, Tucson AZ, USA, February 29- NFDB3 March 4, 2004



[14] Mckay H A C. The Separation and Recycling of Actinides. A Review of the State of the Art, EUR-5801e,1977



[15] Herrmann S D, Durstine K R, Simpson MFl. Pilot-Scale Equipment Development for Pyrochemical Treatment of Spent Oxide Fuel. GLOBAL’99



[16] 独立行政法人科学技术振兴机构原子力业务室.特别推进分野の新规课题募集について.平成18年度募集说明会. 2006/07.



[17] Park S W. Present status of R&D in pyro processing technology of spent fuel in KAERI, Invited lecture at China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, February 22, 2008



[18] Raj B. Status of FBR programme in India. IAEA consultancy Meeting on Innovative Nuclear Fuel and Fuel Cycle Technologies for Fast Reactors, Vienna, Austria, February 13-17, 2006
[1] 蔡卫权 程蓓 张光旭 刘小平. 绿色化学原则在发展*[J]. 化学进展, 2009, 21(10): 2001-2008.