
童铁军团队“样本均值优化算法”一文引用内容分析
中国科学院文献情报中心CiteOpinion研究团队 智能情报重点实验室
科学观察 ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 90-98.
童铁军团队“样本均值优化算法”一文引用内容分析
Citation Analysis of the Article "Optimally Estimating the Sample Mean" by Tiejun Tong's Team
随着开放获取和文本挖掘技术的发展,引用内容分析成为近年来新兴的一种基于内容的分析方法,引用内容富含同行对论文的认可、比较、使用和质疑等信息,比引用次数更优于分析判断论文的科学贡献和实际影响。该文利用CiteOpinion引用内容循证分析工具,结合人工判读,基于引用内容对童铁军团队2018年发表的关于“样本均值优化算法”一文开展创新性和学术影响分析。结果显示,“样本均值优化算法”一文得到同领域学者认可并在医学荟萃分析中产生了重要影响。
With the development of open access and text mining techniques, citation content analysis has become an emerging content-based analysis method in recent years. Citation content is rich in information about peer recognition, comparison, use and questioning of papers, and it is better than citation counts for analysing and judging the scientific contribution and actual impact of papers. This paper uses the CiteOpinion citation content evidence-based analysis tool, combined with manual interpretation, to analyze the innovation and academic impact of a paper on "Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range" published by Tiejun Tong's team in 2018 based on the citation content. The results concluded that the paper was recognised by scholars in the same field and had a significant impact in medical meta-analysis.
引用内容分析 / 引用句 / CiteOpinion / 创新性和学术影响分析 {{custom_keyword}} /
citation content analysis / citation sentence / CiteOpinion / innovation and academic impact analysis {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] | Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, et al. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range[J]. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2018, 27(6):1785-1805. DOI: 10/gdn32t. |
[2] | CiteOpinion代表作学术贡献引用评价循证分析[EB/OL][2021-11-01]. http://citeopinion.dpaper.cn/index.html. |
[3] | Mcgrath S, Zhao X, Steele R, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis[J]. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2020, 29(9):2520-2537. DOI: 10/gmx8bd. |
[4] | Mcgrath S, Sohn H, Steele R, et al. Meta-analysis of the difference of medians[J]. Biometrical Journal, 2020, 62(1):69-98. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201900036. |
[5] | Tsiapakidou S, Apostolidis A, Pantazis K, et al. The use of urinary biomarkers in the diagnosis of overactive bladder in female patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2021[2021-11-01]. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-021-04945-1. DOI: 10/gm9p6p. |
[6] | Sin J C K, King L, Ballard E, et al. Hypophosphatemia and outcomes in ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 2021, 36(9):1025-1035. DOI: 10/gm9p7t. |
[7] | Amiri M, Rhudy J, Masani K, et al. Fibromyalgia and nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and identification of a possible source of heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Pain Research, 2021, Volume 14: 1653-1665. DOI: 10/gm9p78. |
[8] | Shi J, Tong T, Wang Y, et al. Estimating the mean and variance from the five-number summary of a log-normal distribution[J]. Statistics and Its Interface, 2020, 13(4):519-531. DOI: 10.4310/SII.2020.v13.n4.a9. |
[9] | Shi J, Luo D, Weng H, et al. Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary[J]. Research Synjournal Methods, 2020: jrsm.1429. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1429. |
[10] | Cao W, Siegel L, Zhou J, et al. Estimating the reference interval from a fixed effects meta-analysis[J]. Research Synjournal Methods, 2021, 12(5):630-640. DOI: 10/gmbj9x. |
[11] | Wan x, Wang W, Liu J, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range[J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2014, 14(1):135. DOI: 10/f7xmgr. |
[12] | Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement[J]. Plos Medicine, 2009, 6(7):e1000097. DOI: 10/bq3jpc. |
[13] | Higgins J P T, Altman D G, Gotzsche P C, et al. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. Bmj-British Medical Journal, 2011, 343:d5928. DOI: 10/fcq7fv. |
[14] | Higgins J P T, Thompson S G, Deeks J J, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses[J]. British Medical Journal, 2003, 327(7414):557-560. DOI: 10/dhbjj6. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |