Research integrity management has become increasingly important around the world, particularly with
the increase in inter- institutional and -national research collaboration. Due to increasing competition for research
funding and publications, the risk for research integrity management has increased dramatically. All stakeholders
in the research management supply chain including governments, funding bodies, research institutions, researchers
and students, should be included in research integrity management. This paper provides a review of national
and institutional structure and policy on research integrity management in Australia, highlighting the University
of Southern Queensland and The University of Queensland as two case studies. Compliance, research misconduct
management and education for prevention have been highlighted as the three key elements for institutional leadership
in advancing research integrity. Challenges and issues on research integrity management are also addressed.

Proposes a relative index measuring the amount by which an article outgrows, in terms of citations, the publications on which it is based. The study involves citations collected from Web of Science during the last week of April 2010 along with the number of citations received (also in WoS) by each of the references.

Based on the statistical data and indictors system of innovation, the present research analyzes the innovation development trends of China’s high-tech industries. The development characteristics of different sectors and different kinds of economy enterprises of China’s high-tech industries are also discussed. This paper is the first parts of the two-part paper, which reveals the general development trends of high-tech industries in China from the points of innovation input (such as R&D, human resources) and innovation output(patents, new products etc.). The result shows that the technical innovation capability of China’s high-tech industries is still weak, and the industries’ development foundation is also fragile.

The study is one of the series report monitoring the scientific publication of China (series 8). Based on WOS and ESI databases, this report analyzes the overall performance of scientific publications and the disciplinary structure of China using bibliometrical methods. The conclusion includes: 1, The number of scientific publication of China grew steadily in 2010, and the international ranking rose to No.6 from No.7 in 2009. 2, The relative advanced disciplines of China focused on basic research, such as Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, and Engineering. 3, The disciplinary structure of China was similar to India, and the disciplinary structure of main developed countries expressed highly homogeneity.