Review文献类型标注对科研评价结果的影响
|
朱曼曼,沈哲思,陈福佑,杨立英
|
The Influence of Review's Document Type Marking on the Results of Research Evaluation
|
Manman Zhu,Zhesi Shen,Fuyou Chen,Liying Yang
|
|
表2 Web of Science、Scopus和期刊官网中Review论文标签差异 |
|
|
Review系列期刊 | Web of Science | Scopus | 召回率 | 准确率 | F1-score | 召回率 | 准确率 | F1-score | Annual Reviews | 83.5 | 99.9 | 91.0 | 71.5 | 99.7 | 83.3 | Cell Trends | 73.0 | 100.0 | 84.4 | 73.7 | 100.0 | 84.8 | WIREs | 65.5 | 99.8 | 79.1 | 63.4 | 99.8 | 77.5 | Elsevier Current Opinion | 72.9 | 99.5 | 84.2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | Wolters Kluwer Current Opinion | 99.1 | 100.0 | 99.5 | 98.5 | 99.1 | 98.8 | Nature Reviews | 83.7 | 99.3 | 90.8 | 88.6 | 92.4 | 90.5 | Taylor & Francis Expert Opinion | 86.6 | 85.9 | 86.2 | 98.7 | 97.0 | 97.9 | Taylor & Francis Expert Review | 93.6 | 93.3 | 93.4 | 99.9 | 99.1 | 99.5 | Taylor & Francis Critical Review | 99.8 | 54.5 | 70.5 | 98.7 | 87.8 | 92.9 |
|
|
|